Politeness strategies in English conversation: A pragmatic perspective

Authors

  • Farhan Salim UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia
  • Genkateswarlu Dripathi Maulana Azad National Urdu University, India
  • Xavier Mehayov University of Tartu, Estonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65431/jrell.v1i1.3

Keywords:

English conversations, native and non-native speakers, politeness strategies, pragmatic competence

Abstract

This study investigates the use of politeness strategies in spontaneous English conversations, addressing a significant gap in the literature where insights are predominantly drawn from scripted data. While existing research has explored how politeness functions in educational and intercultural contexts, there remains a lack of empirical evidence on real-life interactions that incorporate diverse speaker identities and contexts. The primary aim of this research is to identify and analyze the frequency and distribution of politeness strategies across various interactional settings, with particular attention to the differences between native and non-native speakers and the influence of gender. The research design employed a mixed-methods approach featuring 40 participants from different backgrounds, including both native and non-native English speakers. The study employed a triangulated set of instruments including audio recording devices to capture authentic spoken interactions, a structured Participant Profile Questionnaire to gather demographic data, and a detailed coding framework based on Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory for analyzing politeness strategies. The analysis utilized quantitative methods to code the politeness strategies identified within the conversations and qualitative discourse analysis to interpret these strategies in context. Findings revealed a predominance of positive politeness in peer-to-peer interactions, highlighting the role of relationship-building and social closeness, while negative politeness was prevalent in formal student-teacher exchanges, reflecting an emphasis on respect and deference. Notably, the analysis also showed that gender differences influenced the choice and frequency of politeness strategies, with women often employing more accommodating approaches. This study enriches the understanding of how politeness strategies are contextually employed in English conversations and underscores the need for integrating pragmatic competence into language education. The implications suggest that enhancing awareness and understanding of politeness strategies can significantly improve communicative competence in multicultural and multilingual contexts, benefiting both learners and educators alike.

References

Aksiutina, T. (2023). Speech etiquette patterns as regulators of communicative behavior in English and Ukrainian languages. Scientific Notes of v I Vernadsky Taurida National University Series Philology Journalism, 1(1), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2023.1.1/19

Alaiyed, M. (2023). A comparative analysis of politeness strategies in the animated cartoon angelo rules and its dubbed Arabic version. World Journal of English Language, 13(1), 337. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n1p337

Alsbbagh, Y., & Abdullah, I. (2023). Epistemic modality through the use of adjectives in george w. bush in selected speeches: Urging countries around the world to join the war in Iraq. International Journal of Linguistics Literature and Translation, 6(4), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.4.16

Aspitasari, f., Budiarsa, M., & Rajeg, G. (2022). The positive and negative politeness strategies by the characters every waking breath movie. Humanitatis Journal of Language and Literature, 8(2), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v8i2.1911

Chertian, V., & Kuntjara, E. (2020). The construction of expatriate identity: A critical discourse analysis on “Indonesia expat” magazine. K Ta Kita, 8(2), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.8.2.169-182

Healey, P., Khare, P., Castro, I., Tyson, G., Karan, M., Shekhar, R., … & Purver, M. (2024). Power and vulnerability: Managing sensitive language in organizational communication. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266425

Holtgraves, T. (2021). Understanding miscommunication: Speech act recognition in digital contexts. Cognitive Science, 45(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13023

Ibrahim, N., & Qura, U. (2021). Speech acts used by a gaming youtuber in an online game video. Retorika Jurnal Bahasa Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v14i2.18891

Joll, C., & Aree, S. (2022). Perspectives on Malay language use and autonym preference among urban Malays in south Thailand. Manusya Journal of Humanities, 24(3), 315-333. https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-24030001

Koutchadé, I. (2021). Grammatical transitivity and indirect speech combination in action: Voices from characters in helon habila’s oil on water (2011). International Journal of Linguistics Literature and Translation, 4(11), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.11.10

Le, H. (2022). Politeness strategies in the conversational activities in the course book “campaign 2”. Vnu Journal of Foreign Studies, 39(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5152

Meiratnasari, A., Wijayanto, A., & Suparno, S. (2020). The teacher’s perspective on the impact of politeness strategies in the Indonesian English textbook on student’s communicative competence. Issues in Language Studies, 9(1), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1807.2020

Mojo, J., Tulung, G., Kalangi, L., & Imbang, D. (2021). Positive politeness strategies of Tonado Javaness (jaton) community. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 1100-1109. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5ns1.1493

Mukharomah, L., & Sumanto, O. (2023). An analysis of politeness strategies used by teacher and students in English class at SMPN 1 Mojo Kediri. IREELL, 1(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v1i1.1589

Mularsih, E., & Maudy, A. (2020). Students’ perception of politeness in communicating with teachers through instant messaging application: A narrative inquiry. Surakarta English and Literature Journal, 3(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.52429/selju.v3i1.362

Nawaz, M., Zhu, Y., & Ikhlaq, M. (2023). The sociolinguistic landscape of language representation in Pakistani television dramas: A critical discourse analysis. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-iv)43

Nazeer, I., Yousaf, S., & Anwar, N. (2023). Analyzing linguistic shifts in political discourse: A corpus-based study of political rhetoric in the digital age. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2023.1104.0661

Omer, H., & Al-Azzawi, Q. (2023). A pragmatic analysis of humour in American TV talk shows. JLS, 4(2), 54-76. https://doi.org/10.25130/jls.4.2.6

Pandey, G. (2024). Pragmatic dimensions of language teaching: Theoretical insights and classroom practices. Nepalese Linguistics, 38(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.3126/nl.v38i1.71558

Pasaribu, A., Saragih, E., & Gea, A. (2021). Politeness in thesis consultation by WhatsApp: Do lecturers and students apply different strategies? Elsya Journal of English Language Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i1.6376

Pramujiono, A., & Nurjati, N. (2023). Teachers as models of language politeness in instructional interaction in elementary school. Mimbar Pendidikan, 8(2), 164-174. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v8i2.68200

Robertson, C., Bentele, K., Meyerson, B., Wood, A., & Salwa, J. (2021). Effects of political versus expert messaging on vaccination intentions of trump voters. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3840933

Suganda, D., Yuliawati, S., & Darmayanti, N. (2022). Expression of emotion as impoliteness markers in Instagram comments section in Indonesia: A pragmatic study. Rentas Jurnal Bahasa Sastera Dan Budaya, 1(1), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2022.1.4

Sumanti, C., & Bram, B. (2021). Interruptions and politeness in David Letterman show “my guest no need introduction” Shah Rukh khan episode. Enjourme (English Journal of Merdeka), 6(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v6i1.5962

Urbaniak, A. (2022). Contemporary homo politicus as an ideal orator: A Pragmalinguistic analysis of the inaugural addresses of American presidents from 1981 to 2021. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia, 22, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.14746/snp2022.22.11

Wong, L., & Esler, J. (2020). A review of teaching and learning linguistic politeness. Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature, 1(4), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.46809/jcsll.v1i4.38

Yaghoubzadeh, S. (2021). A study of requests made by negative politeness in English movies and their Persian subtitles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(2), 216. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1102.15

Yang, K. (2022). Book review: Chen Xinren, exploring identity work in Chinese communication. Discourse Studies, 24(6), 804-806. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221089449c

Zhang, Q., & Simin, C. (2021). On positive politeness strategies of teacher talk in English classroom teaching for non-English major undergraduates. Frontiers in Educational Research, 4(10). https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2021.041001

Zhao, J. (2021). Strategies of pragmatic distance employed in English writing by Chinese college students. Journal of South Asian Studies, 9(2), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.33687/jsas.009.02.3332

Downloads

Published

2025-06-13

How to Cite

Salim, F., Dripathi, G., & Mehayov, X. (2025). Politeness strategies in English conversation: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Research in English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.65431/jrell.v1i1.3

Issue

Section

Articles