Politeness in Javanese daily conversations: A sociolinguistic analysis in Temanggung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65431/jrell.v2i1.31Keywords:
Javanese politeness, language shift, sociolinguistics, speech levels, TemanggungAbstract
This study investigates how politeness is expressed, negotiated, and occasionally violated in Javanese daily conversations in Temanggung, a region undergoing rapid sociolinguistic change due to generational language shift. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, natural conversations were collected from 15 interactional events involving speakers of different ages and social relationships. The data were analyzed using a sociolinguistic lens, focusing on Javanese speech levels (Ngoko, Krama, Krama inggil) and politeness frameworks proposed by Brown and Levinson as well as Leech’s politeness maxims. The findings show that younger speakers increasingly rely on Ngoko Lugu in situations where Krama is traditionally expected, particularly when speaking with older interlocutors or individuals of higher social rank. This mismatch often results from reduced exposure to the whole speech level system and the influence of Indonesian as a dominant everyday code. The analysis also reveals that speakers occasionally use pragmatic strategies (such as honorific terms, indirectness, or softening particles) to compensate for limited mastery of Krama. These patterns indicate a shift in how politeness is performed and interpreted in contemporary Javanese interactions. The study highlights the need for sustained cultural and educational efforts to maintain speech level competence as a key component of Javanese linguistic identity..
References
Al-Alwani, A. (2014). Information literacy and knowledge society. King Saud University Press.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Ayu, C. S., Arvianti, I., & Kurniadi, D. (2025). A comparative dialect analysis of Tegal and Purwokerto Ngapak dialects: Exploring lexical and phonological variations. Journal of Education Research, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v6i4.2541
Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007083
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Coupland, N. (2014). Sociolinguistic change, vernacularization, and broadcast British media. In J. Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change (pp. 67-96). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346831.67
Errington, J. (1988). Structure and style in Javanese: A semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Fitria, N. (2018). Javanese politeness and speech behavior in social contexts. Journal of Language and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 119–132.
Gani, A. (2019). Politeness norms in Indonesian society. Humaniora, 31(2), 195–205.
Goebel, Z. (2010). Language, migration, and identity: Neighborly relations in multilingual Indonesia. Oxford University Press.
Humaidi, H. (2020). Pengantar linguistik umum. Prenadamedia Group.
Kádár, D. Z., & Mills, S. (2011). Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Keeler, W. (2017). Javanese speech levels reconsidered: Indexicality and interaction. Pragmatics, 27(4), 509–533.
Kennedy, C. (2023). Professional development for language teachers in digital environments. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 120–138.
Kurniawan, B. (2011). Unggah-ungguh basa Jawa dan realisasi sosialnya. Jurnal Bahasa dan Budaya, 5(1), 45–58.
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.
Mantiri, F. R., Triawati, C., & Susanto, H. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of digital literacy in English teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(4), 18–25.
Muhammad, A. (2011). Metode penelitian bahasa. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Prayitno, A. (2011). Kesantunan berbahasa dalam interaksi sosial. Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 29(2), 206–218.
Ratnasari, A., Arvianti, I., & Kurniadi, D. (2022). The differences of Pati and Kudus dialect: Dialectological studies. Surakarta English and Literature Journal, 5(1), 49–58.
Riska, V., Kurniadi, D., & Muhid, A. (2025). Analisis perbandingan pilihan leksikal dialek Khek dan Tiochiu pada komunitas Tionghua Kalimantan Barat. JIIP – Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(9), 11125–11136. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i9.9293
Santoso, L. (2020). Politeness strategies in Indonesian communication. Journal of Pragmatic Studies, 9(1), 10–22.
Smith-Hefner, N. J. (2020). Youth language, education, and Krama decline in Central Java. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 30(2), 165–183.
Smith-Hefner, N. J. (2023). Hierarchy, politeness, and change in contemporary Javanese. Language in Society, 52(4), 601–622.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa. Duta Wacana University Press.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa (Edisi revisi). Sanata Dharma University Press.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Suwadji, I. (2013). Tata Krama dalam bahasa Jawa. Pustaka Widyatama.
Wamafma, R. (2010). Pengantar sosiolinguistik. Unima Press.
Zentz, L. (2017). Statehood, scale, and hierarchy: History, language, and identity in Indonesia. Multilingual Matters.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Research in English Language Teaching and Linguistics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


